More throughput from the assets you already own.
Manufacturing improvement doesn't always require capital expenditure. The most durable gains come from aligning your overhead structure, scheduling discipline, and supplier relationships with actual volume realities.
The four challenges we see most often
Capacity vs. overhead mismatch
Fixed overhead structures built for peak volumes become a drag during contraction. Most manufacturers don't have a clear view of their true breakeven by product line.
Production scheduling inefficiency
Suboptimal scheduling creates unnecessary changeovers, inflated WIP, and missed delivery windows — all without appearing in the P&L as a named line item.
Supply chain concentration
Single-source dependencies create fragility. Many manufacturers have rationalised supplier counts too aggressively, trading resilience for short-term cost savings.
Make-vs-buy drift
Decisions made at one cost structure remain in place long after the economics have changed. Regular make-vs-buy review is rare but high-value.
What a typical engagement delivers
Our manufacturing engagements start with a detailed cost model — not the management accounts version, but a true product-level view with overhead properly allocated. That analysis typically surfaces 3–5 underperforming product lines that are consuming disproportionate capacity.
Implementation then focuses on scheduling discipline, supplier consolidation, and — where warranted — rationalising the product range itself.
Throughput improvement without capital expenditure
Overhead cost reduction after rationalisation
Reduction in changeover time through scheduling
EBIT margin improvement (median across engagements)
Start with the Diagnostic Sprint.
30 days. A product-level view of where you are leaving margin on the floor.
Book a Diagnostic ↗